Letter to New Hampshire Legislators

One of the most obvious reasons the Supreme Court has refused to take any eligibility case is that it -the Supreme Court- has already decided the matter of Obama’s eligibility for office–in 1875. Reaffirmed several times since then and even by Congress in 2008, ref SR-511, there is no need for a ‘clarified’ definition of ‘natural born citizen’, and Obama can be removed right now…not by impeachment, not by a Congressional wimps ‘r us hearings, not by the 25th Amendment–but by his immediate arrest.

A review:

The binding language in the Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, that requires the president be a natural born citizen:

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

The binding legal precedent as to the definition of natural born citizen:

“At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v Happersett 1875

“Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects save that of eligibility to the Presidency.” Luria v. U.S., 1913

The Fourteenth Amendment was definitively a statement about slaves becoming citizens of the United States;

John Bingham, “father of the 14th Amendment”, the abolitionist congressman from Ohio who prosecuted Lincoln’s assassins, reaffirmed the definition known to the framers, not once, but twice during Congressional discussions of Citizenship pertaining to the upcoming 14th Amendment and a 3rd time nearly 4 years after the 14th was adopted.

The House of Representatives definition for “natural born Citizen” was read into the Congressional Record during the Civil War, without contest!

“All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.” (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862)).

The House of Representatives definition for “natural born Citizen” was read into the Congressional Record after the Civil War, without contest!

“every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))”

No other Representative ever took issue with these words on the floor of the House. If you read the Congressional Globe to study these debates, you will see that many of the underlying issues were hotly contested. However, Bingham’s definition of “natural born citizen” (born of citizen parents in the sovereign territory of the U.S.) was never challenged on the floor of the House. Without a challenge on the definition, it appears the ALL where in agreement.

Then, during a debate (see pg. 2791) on April 25, 1872 regarding a certain Dr. Houard, who had been incarcerated in Spain, the issue was raised on the floor of the House of Representatives as to whether the man was a US citizen (generally. they were not trying to decide if he was a NBC). Representative Bingham (of Ohio), stated on the floor:

“As to the question of citizenship I am willing to resolve all doubts in favor of a citizen of the United States. That Dr. Houard is a natural-born citizen of the United States there is not room for the shadow of a doubt. He was born of naturalized parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, and by the express words of the Constitution, as amended to-day, he is declared to all the world to be a citizen of the United States by birth.”

The arguments from the flat-earth the eligibility deniers have been thoroughly discredited. They have managed to distract the general public away from this dangerous threat to our national security…and those that continue to cover for him will one day have to tell their children–from their own jail cell– how they allowed this mess to go on.

Until Minor v. Happersett is overturned, the SCOTUS holding stands: Obama is not eligible to be president of the United States. He is only a usurper.

The Provost Marshal is nominated by the President and Defense Secretary…and the Defense Secretary would have to give the order to arrest…what to do when the usurper has control ?

Put on your big boy pants and arrest him or resign.

Now I know no one in the NH legislation body would arrest him but it is clear he has commited fraud, he is NOT an NBC and needs to be disqualified from haveing his name on our ballot. You took an oath to uphold the Constitution. You are either going honor that oath or not. By not honoring that oath you are guilty of Misprision of a Felony and I will work tirelessly to see that all of you are held accountable.

Greg Goss
Hudson NH

Part of the above was taken from Dr Kate The Supreme Court Has Decided Obama’s Eligibility and embellished by me.

This entry was posted in 666, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Birth Certificate, Constitution, Illegal Immigrant, Muslim, Natural Born Citizen, Patriotic, Political, POTUS, SCOTUS, Uncategorized, Usurper. Bookmark the permalink.

257 Responses to Letter to New Hampshire Legislators

  1. floridafree says:

    I love it watching all of the talking heads at FAUX tripping over their tongue’s as they are starting to admit that Ron Paul could win Iowa with polls showing him only 1% behind neoCON should have been long gone Gingrich.

  2. jacqlynsmith says:

    Very good……


  3. jacqlynsmith says:

    Very important video to watch and share…..

    VET SOLDIER says the Military is waking up to – FEMA camps and NDAA Reality!
    A MUST LISTEN – Soldiers are no longer blind to what is happening..

  4. jacqlynsmith says:

    Ann Coulter: Romney ‘Most Conservative’ Candidate

    Columnist Ann Coulter recently said, “Of the available candidates, Romney is by far the most conservative.”

    Courtesy of Lew Rockwell’s Political Theatre, here’s Romney in 2002 describing his views as

    No doubt he had a complete change of heart just in time to run for president. Funny how that happens.


    Mitt Romney in Worcester 2002 “My views are progressive”

  5. jacqlynsmith says:

    If, Ron Paul gets the GOP nomination: Ron Paul gets the following voters:

    (A) 2008 Obama voters who thought they were going to get ‘Change’
    (B) 2008 Obama voters who voted to end the wars.
    (C) The VAST majority of the Independent vote,
    (D) The entire GOP voting block who dislikes Obama enough to vote for Ron Paul instead.
    (E) Ron Paul supporters coming out to vote in DROVES.
    (F) Same-sex couples who want to be set free.
    (G) Democratic, disillusioned Anti-Drug war voters.
    (H) Libertarians.

    Ron Paul and America wins!

  6. jacqlynsmith says:

    A message from John Tate – Ron Paul Tea Party Money Bomb

  7. jacqlynsmith says:

    NEW Drinking With Bob On Ron Paul!
    Submitted by fatlibertarian on Wed, 12/14/2011 – 16:31

    Ron Paul 2012

    LOL, Bob was in rare form in this one. Bob, of the popular drinking with bob YouTube rants, has become a true RonPaulBot!

  8. jacqlynsmith says:

    From the Daily Paul….send it viral folks…..

    TONIGHT 9PM EST- Live Stream: Four NH Reps to Discuss Ron Paul Tonight

    There is a great townhall going on now in Derry, NH with Senators Sanborn and White.

    At 9pm EST tonight, streaming live online and on Manchester TV 23 four reps will join together to discuss their support for Dr. Ron Paul.

    Myself along with Rep. Andrew Manuse, Rep. Mark Warden, and host Rep. Steve Vaillancourt will spend the bulk of the hour discussing why we support Ron Paul for President.

    Tune in at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/8059353 or at http://www.manchestertv.org/TVpages/public.html

    Please share this feed. There will be an archive posted after that I will update.

  9. jacqlynsmith says:

    LOVE IT….pass it on….the REVOLUTION IS ALIVE AND WELL…..

    -The Grinch Imploding, Romney at his Ceiling – BLOOD in the Water !
    Submitted by RonThenRand on Wed, 12/14/2011 – 11:05

    Ron Paul 2012

    After 5 Years of “Ron Paul Cant Win” the BIG MEDIA False Reality is in Collapse…With the Big Medias latest Flavor of the Month…. “Loot” Gingrich…starting to Impload (down 9% in a Week in Iowa) and with Mittens Romney at what seems to be his…CEILING…for MONTHS NOW the Controled Big Media is in Full on Freak out mode as Dr. Ron Paul moves up in poll after poll.

    Just watched a FOXNEWS Freak out over Ron Pauls big Move up in N.H. with one of the Big Hair pieces over there saying “if Ron Paul takes Iowa this is not looking Good for the Republican party”..(LOL!)..Talk Show Host Mike Savage told his 10,000,000(+) Market that he would give Gingrich $1 Million to drop out of the race because hes a CRIMINAL Who “can not Win”…Mark Levin then attacked savage and said he would give him $100,000 to drop his show (altough Levin admits he doesnt know who to support). Gingrich Lost his top staff member in Iowa lastnight as 2 polls in 24 Hours show his support has Collapsed (thanks to the Ron Paul FACT ADDS on Him.)….Even the talking heads over a Politico are now screaming that “Romney has no base of support and cant go anywhere”!…Hannity and Orielly are about to enter the “no B.S. Zone” and are OBVIOUSLY SCARED TO DEATH of having to deal with REALITY (after months…Uhhh make that YEARS of “We removed Ron Paul from Our Poll because a hacker smashed in and jacked his support way up!”)

    And all of this is going on at the same time that Ron Paul is not only moving up BIG TIME in the Polls but also as Supporters of Liberty (from BOTH the “left” and the “right”) are Joining to together for another Ron Paul MONEY BOMB DEC. 16th to load Dr. Paul up even more Gold/Silver to Run yet another Massive Round of TV..FACT…Adds to awaken even more sleeping Americans to the cause of Liberty !!

    Im Expecting the Dark Side to open up a new Attack on Dr. Paul any moment to try to cut down this Revolution because they can see as well as we that Green Shoots of Liberty are spring up all around them !

    …MOUNT UP FOLKS We are in it to WIN IT !!!

    On….. to S.C., FL, NV, CO, MN, MA, CA, ID, WA, OH, TN, TX….


  10. jacqlynsmith says:

    30 Major U.S. Corporations Paid More to Lobby Congress Than Income Taxes, 2008-2010


  11. jacqlynsmith says:

    I love this! LOL. He is so courageous!!

    Ron Paul Responds to TSA: Introduces ‘American Traveler Dignity Act’

  12. jacqlynsmith says:

    Tom Woods vs. Mark Levin

    I’ve linked to this page from two separate videos now, so you may encounter more here than the video you watched led you to expect.

    First, my exchange with Levin on presidential war powers. He refused to link to my replies. I’m happy to link to his. Here’s the whole exchange:

    Levin’s original comments on radio, transcribed;
    My blog post in response;
    His reply;
    My challenge;
    His alleged reply to my challenge;
    My summary and conclusion (“How I Sent Mark Levin Home Crying”).

    See also my lengthy Q&A-style essay “The Phony Case for Presidential War Powers.”

    For a great deal more on presidential war powers and the Constitution, see the website of Louis Fisher, among the country’s foremost experts on the subject.

    Second, foreign policy. Levin and his friend Jeffrey Lord of The American Spectator claim Ron Paul’s noninterventionist foreign policy makes him a left-liberal [!]. This is completely false.

    Mark Levin, Ron Paul Hater, Put in His Place

    American Spectator Dead Wrong on Ron Paul

    Lord tried responding to this. That was a mistake. I came back with this article.

    Here are some other relevant pieces of mine:

    Do Conservatives Hate Their Own Founder? Russell Kirk on Militarism
    Come Home, Conservatives — To the Antiwar Conservative Movement
    The Conservative Case Against the War: A Review
    No Patronizing, No Sloganeering

    I also recommend Bill Kauffman’s Ain’t My America: The Long, Noble History of Antiwar Conservatism and Middle American Anti-Imperialism.

    Daniel P. McCarthy, editor of The American Conservative magazine, gives a good overview of the correct conservative foreign policy in this extended interview (part one deals primarily with domestic issues):

    More videos and it continues here…..


  13. jacqlynsmith says:

    Gotta’ love the DOC….listen to this interview with FIX NEWS this morning….

    Tell the truth!

    You can’t be called a flip-flopper if you tell the truth!

    Love it.

    Ron Paul ‘Americans Are Coming Around To Liberty’

  14. jacqlynsmith says:

    Great video…..tells what is really going on…..

    Hitler reacts to Ron Paul’s rise in Polls

  15. jacqlynsmith says:

    Great article to pass on……

    Another Examiner.com article prompted this piece. While it might be easier to simply respond to the other column’s claims (many of which are rather ludicrous), the current times seem to suggest that it correlates more with common sense to look towards the future, including Ron Paul’s election to the presidency.

    1. Paul will abolish the Federal Reserve
    Since its formation in 1913, America’s private bank has contributed to loss of value in the dollar as well as multiple wars to protect central banking interests. The manipulation of interest rates by Fed leaders has also led to generations that consume and do not save, thus reducing the ability of retirees to manage their own lives without government pensions or safety nets. By all considerations, the institution is no better than Hitler’s Reichstag, and Paul’s courage in opposing its continued operation forms the basis of his historical greatness as president.

    2. Respect for the 1st Amendment
    After both “conservative,” and “liberal,” presidents have proven to follow each others marks step by step when pursuing policies relating to the cessation of individual liberty, Ron Paul will end violations of the 1st Amendment and stop enforcing the Patriot Act through his administration. Unlike many politicians, both past and present, Paul understands that an act by Congress cannot legally suppress the Constitution, thus making laws such as the Patriot Act and others wholly anti-freedom and therefore unacceptable.
    3. Free Trade
    Ron Paul’s presidency will be noted for its pursuit of free trade with all countries, not the cartelization of corporate interests in unfair international boundaries. Rather than hiding behind two-state loathing from the Cold War, Paul believes that America should trade with all nations, including Cuba, Iran and North Korea. Through these changes our economy will expand, leaving relics of leftist extremism such as Castro a lame statue for the past. The congressman would also oppose a North America Union or any other similar trade blocs, thus endorsing truly neoliberal policies which America has too long ignored.
    4. Taxes
    Paul opposes class warfare and believes in abolishing the Income Tax. Not only will this approach create millions of jobs, but its falls in line with the critical aspect of empowering Americans to take responsibility for their own lives rather than granting more power to the government. As with the Federal Reserve, lower taxes will promote saving and investment, influencing Americans in a meaningful way to prepare for their futures instead of leaving it at the feet of a broken federal authority.
    5. War on Drugs
    America has spent the last two decades fighting an endless war on drug distribution that costs more than simply decriminalizing–or even legalizing–the substances. Rather than spending billions and losing countless lives in law enforcement and civilian populations, Ron Paul will devolve power to the states and end this senseless pursuit of a moral high ground once and for all. With the unspent money remaining, America will secure the borders and focus on real homeland security–not societal paranoia.
    6. Immigration Security
    Both major political parties have argued for radical approaches to immigration control. On one side, Republicans propose an expensive fence and guest worker programs to deal with the massive immigration problem. Democrats prefer amnesty and instate tuition benefits for illegal alien students (or former Democrats like Rick Perry). Ron Paul’s presidency will oversee the halting of benefits for all those who come here illegally, thus helping our border hospitals and saving America billions of dollars each year. A Paul Administration would handle this issue sensibly; not by spending billions more simply to feel safe inside the head.
    7. Humble Foreign Policy
    In stark contrast to both major party leaders, Paul will end frivolous intervention around the world to restore American prosperity. As a veteran and Air Force flight surgeon, the congressman understands the importance of human life better than most public officials, and he will fail to send troops into battle like pawns in a suicidal scheme to save face or secure corporatist interests. His administration will avoid unnecessary intervention and push for a view on foreign affairs where America responds when attacked–not to endorse a ridiculous notion of expensive democracy in the Middle East. Under his watch foreign aid to murderous regimes such as the Palestinian National Authority and North Korea will be ended, thus preventing the expansion of violence around the globe.
    8. Upholding the Oath
    Most importantly, Ron Paul will respect the oath he takes when sworn into office in 2013. To the congressman, an oath is before God, not a simple recitation that can be bended according to political expediency. With him at the helm, Americans will once again believe in the Constitution as the foundation of this country’s political culture, and a new generation will be born that understands limits of the government. Should we as a nation reclaim this committal to founding principle, there is not end to what we may accomplish as one united country, standing together as a whole, and not splintered among warring factions.


  16. jacqlynsmith says:

    Think the media isn’t biased and is telling you the truth listen up…this is good…..more proof that DR. Paul is WINNING!!!! Get this to the masses ASAP!!!!

    Santelli HAMMERS Hannity! Listen!

    Ron Paul 2012


    Wow, listen to Hannity disparage RP. UNREAL!!!

    Starts around the 6 or 7 minute mark…

  17. jacqlynsmith says:

    Do you all remember Terri who used to post here and started her own blog from time to time….I got this email from her last week please pass it on….she is trying to sell some RON PAUL campaign stuff ….thanks….

    Thanks Jackie, I enjoyed that interview. I’m on the Ron Paul train in a big way, so if you know anyone looking for Ron Paul campaign gear, etc. please send them to my website at http://www.moodswingindesigns.com/

    Thank You,

  18. jacqlynsmith says:

    Pass this on everyone…

    Blue Republicans Buck the Establishment

    Posted by Kurt Wallace on Dec 15, 2011

    Robin Koerner writer for the Huffington Post joins Daily Paul Radio with Kurt Wallace for ‘Blue Republicans Buck the Establishment’ to discuss his article If You Love Peace, Become a “Blue Republican” (Just for a Year) and the movement of new supporters at BlueRepublican.org.

    Special Thanks to our sponsor Ron Paul Swag for offering listeners of this podcast a 10% discount with promo code Blue on all special edition Blue Republican Gear T-Shirts and Flyers.

    audio can be found here…..


  19. jacqlynsmith says:

    The TRUTH-O-METER on Bachmann…..
    The Truth-O-Meter Says:
    Says Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that “if he has a nuclear weapon he will use it to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. He will use it against the United States of America.”

    continues here….


  20. jacqlynsmith says:

    I loved the part in the debate where the good doctor points out that he would be a DIFFERENT kind of President…..God knows we need one……

    Debate: Ron Paul defends positions under fire
    Mary Stegmeir
    10:02 PM, Dec 15, 2011

    Ron Paul retained his limited government and anti-war stances amidst heavy criticism tonight from his fellow GOP contenders .

    The Texas congressman’s acceptance of earmarks for his district was questioned by a debate moderator, while Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann called Paul’s non-interventionist foreign policy positions “dangerous.”

    But in both instances, Paul returned to the talking points that helped him place second in this summer’s Iowa Straw Poll in Ames. Shrinking the federal government and pulling back from foreign entanglements are both needed in order to balance the budget and get the country’s financial house in order, Paul said.

    “I would be a different kind of president … I, as a president, wouldn’t want to run the world,” Paul said. “I don’t want to police individual activities … and I don’t want to run the economy. That’s an entirely different philosophy, but it’s very, very much in our tradition and in the tradition of our Constitution.”

    Paul said he has never voted for legislation that includes earmarks, but noted that he does apply for the funds to support projects in his state and district. He likened his actions to those of an individual who opposes the income tax, yet files for deductions.

    “I never voted for an earmark, but I do argue the case for the people I represent to try to get their money back whenever possible,” Paul said.

    The 76-year-old politician also addressed concerns that his libertarian views make him unelectable

    “I have something different to offer,” said Paul, who noted that he is the only candidate with a plan to cut $1 trillion from the federal government in one year. “ I think the important thing is the philosophy I’m talking about is the Constitution and freedom, and that brings people together.”


  21. jacqlynsmith says:

    ROMNEY caught in another FAT CHECKING LIE…..send it viral folks…..THESE PEOPLE ARE SERIAL LIARS ……

    The truth about Romney’s time in France as a ‘poor missionary’…. he ‘lived in a Mormon palace with chef and houseboy’

    GOP presidential candidate was missionary in France
    Claimed he learned life lessons and defecated in bucket
    But mission president’s son says Romney lived in mansion with chandeliers and chefs

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2074770/Mitt-Romney-lived-Mormon-palace-chef-houseboy-1960s-France-mission.html#ixzz1giYkgqzt

  22. DABIGRAGU says:

    A quick FYI here, just got back and wanted to report: NOTHING, absolutely nothing found, very interesting to say the least. I’ll email you later with more detail. Take care buddy.

  23. jacqlynsmith says:

    Criminal investigations close in on G5 Western banking cabal as its access to credit is choked off across the globe…..

    Barack Obama faces legal probe over unlawfully tangling America in NATO Libyan invasion. George Soros feels the heat of legal due process in connection with his financial interference in US government business. UK-France public row over EuroZone chaos indicates accelerating fragmentation of Western cabal organisation. German banks face market meltdown. Commerzbank is now a basketcase for emergency nationalisation and breakup.

    A benevolent military coup in the US becomes more likely by the day as the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies line up against the Washington corporation’s anti-Constitutional US Homeland Security apparat.

    And unknown to most international market traders, eighty five percent of the global gold inventory is held off-market in Asia. Soon this gold is going to be brought on-market through the China South Rare and Precious Metal Exchange. Will Asia’s firework display be the Western cabal’s execution bonfire? More global background here (12.12.11).


  24. jacqlynsmith says:

    From the Daily Paul…..looks like Bachmann distorted the truth and will get called on it….she is good at that…….

    BACHAMANN Buzz-O-Meter on Facts Blazes “Liar-Red” New Point
    Submitted by HonorGod on Fri, 12/16/2011 – 09:17

    How MUCH can you twist and turn, reach and grope?

    Well let’s take a look…

    I copied the whole Constitution of Iran (I am sure in a database now). Then I searched multiple terms in the word doc. If we were to believe Mrs. Bachman, we would think that Jihad and global conquering would be PLASTERED all over this document.

    Buzz-O-Meter goes off RED Like the Batphone Bat-Woman Bachmann doesn’t have.

    Mrs Bachmanns comment “Look no further than the Iranian Constitution which states unequivocally that their admiss…their mission is to extend jihad across the world and eventually to set up a world-wide caliphate. We would be fools and naives to ignore their purpose and their plan” at 13:02 on the compiled video (front page of DP).

    OK Michelle, let’s Fact check that.

    I found “JIHAD” a massive total of ONE TIME in the Constitution of Iran. Check this out:

    Article 147
    In time of peace, the government must utilize the personnel and technical equipment of the Army in relief operations, and for educational and productive ends, and the Construction Jihad, while fully observing the criteria of Islamic justice and ensuring that such utilization does not harm the combat-readiness of the Army.

    Now, your next question should be; What in the heck does “Construction Jihad” mean?

    Well the Federation of American Scientist in 1998 made the following determination on the Iranian constitution that was adopted on October 24, 1979:

    Revolutionary Guards’ Pasdaran Construction Jihad
    The monopoly of the regular armed forces over domestic arms production and repair industries ended in 1983 when the SDC authorized the Pasdaran to establish its own military industries. This new policy was in line with the Pasdaran’s growing political and military weight. Beginning in 1984, the first Pasdaran armaments factory manufactured 120mm mortars, antipersonnel grenades, various antichemical-warfare equipment, antitank rockets, and rocket-propelled grenades.

    Prior to 1989 the ballistic missiles program was responsibility of the missile unit Wakhid-e-Mashachekh of the Revolutionary Guards. In 1989, elements of the Ministry of Defense and the Guards merged to form the Ministry of the Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL), and their production facilities were merged into the Defense Industry Organization (DIO).


    So, what does this mean? Very simply put, the Iranian Military industrial Complex is OWNED and MANAGED by the Iranian government. The name Pasdaran is simply another name for the Iranian revolutionary Guard
    ( http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/pasdaran.htm )

    You have been Debunked and Corrected again Michelle.


  25. jacqlynsmith says:

    Good interview…
    Judge Napolitano asks Lew Rockwell ‘Can Ron Paul Survive the Attacks?’


  26. jacqlynsmith says:

    “Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed the conviction that these liberties are the gift of God?” – Thomas Jefferson

  27. jacqlynsmith says:

    Ron Paul’s Constitutionalist, Anti-War Stance Supported By U.S. Troops

    Establishment media attacks Paul after confrontation with Bachmann

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Friday, December 16, 2011

    Following Ron Paul’s clash with Michele Bachmann over foreign policy during last night’s Republican debate in Iowa, the establishment media characterized Paul’s views as an “outburst” that could cost him votes, when in reality the majority of Republican voters now want U.S. troops brought home, troops who themselves support Paul over every other GOP candidate.

    Continues here…..


  28. jacqlynsmith says:

    I think this is an important article to start circulating everywhere as the GOOD DOCTOR is now making his rise in the polls and the CHICKENHAWK RINO’s can’t handle it……WAKE UP AMERICA……

    I Advocate the Same Foreign Policy the Founding Fathers Would

    by Ron Paul


  29. jacqlynsmith says:

    SHAME ON BACHMANN AND THE GRINCH……Dr.Paul is the only one with the courageous to be honest and truthful with the American people……the ESTABLISHMENT IS SHAKING IN THEIR BOOTS……

    “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.”
    ― Ron Paul, The Revolution: A Manifesto

    Michele Bachmann’s run for the White House
    Debate fact check: Gingrich, Bachmann caught out
    December 16, 2011

    By CALVIN WOODWARD, Associated Press

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Newt Gingrich overlooked a couple of years of red ink when he asserted Thursday night that he balanced the budget for four years as House speaker. And in claiming sole credit for the achievement, he glossed over the fact that budgets are not a one-man show: There was a Democratic president in town, too.

    In the last debate before the leadoff Iowa Republican presidential caucuses, Gingrich persisted in repeating a claim he has made often in the campaign, sometimes more accurately than others. Here and there, other candidates, too, reprised misstatements or partial truths from the string of debates and from the stump. Mitt Romney once again declared he has spent his life in the private sector, ignoring his years as governor and political candidate.

    A look at some of the claims in the debate and how they compare with the facts:

    GINGRICH: “I balanced the budget for four straight years, paid off $405 billion in debt _ pretty conservative.”

    THE FACTS: In the 1996 and 1997 budget years, the first two years he served as speaker of the House of Representatives, the government actually ran deficits. In 1998 and 1999, the government ran surpluses. Two more years of surpluses followed, but Gingrich was gone from politics by then and had nothing to do with them.

    Moreover, the national debt went up during the four years Gingrich was speaker. In January 1995, when he became speaker, the gross national debt was $4.8 trillion. When he left four years later, it was $5.6 trillion, an increase of $800 billion.

    To be sure, Gingrich did not single-handedly deepen America’s debt, just as he didn’t balance any budgets on his own. He was a driving force, along with Democratic President Bill Clinton and figures in both houses of Congress, in the economic setbacks and advancements of that time.


    ROMNEY: “I spent my life, my career, in the private sector.”

    THE FACTS: This is true — except for four years as Massachusetts governor, recent years running for president in the 2008 and 2012 elections, a few years running the Olympics and the time he put into his failed run for a Senate seat in 1994.

    In essence, Romney has devoted himself to political endeavors since his successful run for governor in 2002, and has been pursuing the presidency for five years.

    A month after his term as governor ended in 2007, he announced his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination. After John McCain defeated him for the nomination, Romney devoted himself to building a political network, helping Republican candidates raise money, and writing a book that set the stage for his second run for president.

    Indeed, Romney, who made his fortune as founder of the investment firm Bain Capital, has not held a private-sector job with a regular paycheck for more than a decade.


    MICHELE BACHMANN: “We have an IAEA report that just recently came out that said literally Iran is within just months of being able to obtain that (a nuclear) weapon.”

    RON PAUL: “There is no U.N. report that said that. It’s totally wrong, what you just said.”

    Bachmann: “It’s the IAEA report.”

    THE FACTS: As Paul said, the report of the International Atomic Energy Agency does not state that Iran is within months of having nuclear arms. The U.N. agency report does suggest that Iran conducted secret experiments whose sole purpose is the development of nuclear weapons but did not put a time frame on when Iran might succeed in building a bomb, and it made no final conclusion on Tehran’s intent.

    Bachmann also erred by arguing that Iran has “stated they will use it (a nuclear weapon) against the United States.”

    Iran vehemently rejects that it is developing a nuclear bomb, let alone that it plans to drop one on the U.S.


    ROMNEY: “I’m firmly in support of people not being discriminated against based upon their sexual orientation. At the same time, I oppose same-sex marriage. That’s been my position from the beginning.”

    THE FACTS: In large measure, Romney has been consistent in those two positions, despite accusations of flip-flopping on gay rights.

    He walked a fine line back in his failed 1994 Senate campaign, vowing to fight for equality but stopping short of endorsing gay marriage. That’s the same line he walked Thursday night.

    He has changed, though, on whether gay marriage should be addressed at the state or federal level. He has favored a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage at least since the beginning of his 2008 presidential bid, when he was the only major Republican candidate to do so. In 1994, he had said the matter should be decided by individual states. That was before the idea of a constitutional ban had gained traction in politics.


    BACHMANN: “After the debates that we had last week, PolitiFact came out and said that everything I said was true.”

    THE FACTS: False.

    For the second debate in a row, Gingrich complained that Bachmann wasn’t getting her facts straight, this time when she went after him for the big money he made from Freddie Mac. In her own defense, Bachmann cited ratings from PolitiFact, a fact-checking organization that ranks statements on a scale from true to false, with the worst offender being “Pants on Fire” false.

    PolitiFact rated two Bachmann statements from last week’s debate. One, claiming Gingrich once believed in an individual health care mandate, was ranked mostly true. The other, that Romney introduced “socialized medicine” in his state, was judged “Pants on Fire” false.

    Indeed, Bachmann has the worst record of accuracy in the Republican field, as rated by that organization and traced by others. Fully 73 percent of her statements checked by PolitiFact were judged mostly false or worse. Gingrich was wrong the next most often, 59 percent of the time.


  30. jacqlynsmith says:

    DABIGRAGU says:
    December 16, 2011 at 12:14 pm

    A quick FYI here, just got back and wanted to report: NOTHING, absolutely nothing found, very interesting to say the least. I’ll email you later with more detail. Take care buddy.


    Hey Dabig…..WTH you been???

  31. jacqlynsmith says:

    “Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
    ― Ron Paul

  32. jacqlynsmith says:

    Love this article……from an Air Force Veteran…..

    Friday, December 16, 2011

    Should Elected Leaders be Entitled to Private Lives?
    By Peter Lemiska

    Not long ago, Herman Cain was a clear favorite to win the Republican nomination for President. He was seen as a likeable, yet savvy businessman and a bold straight-talker, a welcome relief from the life-long denizens of D.C., who care more about their own political futures than the future of the country. Cain seemed to be exactly what the country was looking for, until those allegations began to surface – a series of accusations related to past sexual harassment and a 13-year extra-marital affair. He was able to deflect them for a while, but was eventually forced to suspend his campaign.

    Long before that, presidential candidate Bill Clinton was caught up in a very similar set of circumstances, yet in that case, it caused little more than a ripple in his campaign. His supporters remained loyal, and instead chose to discredit his accusers, or argue that his peccadilloes were a private matter. It was not until the blue dress, and the ensuing perjury charges and impeachment proceedings, that many began to understand the connection between character and leadership.

    While the responses to these two examples seem to reflect a profound difference in the core values of the two political parties, they also raise a simple, but important question: Does the voting public have the right to delve into the private lives of our elected officials?

    Most of us accept the concept that workers engaged in certain professions have to surrender some of their privacy. Applicants to police departments and private security firms routinely undergo thorough background investigations, often including polygraph exams. Those entrusted with large sums of money, people involved in the home-care service, even school bus drivers have to undergo some sort of background screening.

    For decades, our federal government has recognized the need to vet those individuals entrusted with national security secrets, or placed in sensitive positions. Those people willingly submit to intrusive background investigations, testing their loyalty, their integrity, and their level of personal responsibility. Yes, issues related to moral turpitude are examined, but so are other issues, potentially more serious, like criminal history and questionable associations. Everything in their personal backgrounds, anything that could place them in compromising situations, is examined and resolved. The importance of these investigations was emphasized in a recent Washington Times article highlighting the concern in Congress that Al Qaeda is attempting to infiltrate our military. The monies and time expended to conduct these background investigations are staggering, but they are essential to our national security. Yes, there will always be a few who beat the system, but overall, the screening measures in place ensure a good measure of confidence in the men and women who serve our country.

    But to paraphrase an old expression, corruption flows downhill. So what does all of this accomplish, if those at the top, the leaders who direct our military and government workers, those whose decisions and actions affect all of our lives, are permitted to shroud their pasts in secrecy? In a very real sense, they are public employees, our employees, paid by our tax dollars, and we should be entitled to any background information related to their suitability for the office they seek or currently hold.

    Many assume that political candidates undergo a screening process by the FBI or some other impartial entity. That is simply not the case. In our system, the voters are responsible for vetting our political candidates. But how do we do that? Do slick campaign ads tell us anything about a candidate’s character? Can we rely on a largely discredited news media to expose unfavorable information on a favored candidate? John Edwards was once a strong contender for his party’s nomination for the presidency, yet we didn’t learn about the affair leading to his misuse of campaign funds until after his political demise.

    So unless a Jennifer Flowers or a Ginger White emerges, the private lives of these public figures remain virtually sealed. Even when scandals erupt, we never learn the whole story. As Al Gore reportedly confided to Bob Woodward, the American public knows “one percent” of what went on during Clinton’s presidency.

    Nonetheless, the voters are generally indifferent about the private lives of our elected officials, especially if they happen to be supporters. There are no demands for a formal vetting process. Voters instead assess their abilities and suitability based on their public personas. Ultimately, they cast their votes for the candidates who look the best, sound the best, and promise the most.

    It’s been said that power corrupts, but too many politicians have a head start even before they’re handed the reins of power. Absent an effective vetting process, voters have to demand more transparency and access to all information and historical documents needed to assess our leaders’ character, integrity, sense of responsibility, and, yes, loyalty to the Constitution. Unless we conduct our own due diligence, we lay the foundation for a weak and corrupt government.

    – – – –

    Peter Lemiska is an Air Force veteran, a former Senior Special Agent of the U.S. Secret Service, and holds a BA degree in psychology. He has conducted and undergone countless background investigations during his 28-years of government service. He can be contacted at plemis2@hotmail.com.


  33. jacqlynsmith says:

    hmmmmm..this is GREAT NEWS………pretty telling…….the NEO CONS/ESTABLISHMENT ARE GOING DOWN!!!!

    Ron Paul Sees Big Fan Growth After Last Debate This Week on Inside Facebook’s Elections Tracker

    Brittany Darwell•Dec 16th, 2011

    Texas congressman Ron Paul was the biggest gainer in our Inside Facebook 2012 Election Tracker after the Republican presidential debate Thursday night — the last debate before the Iowa caucus on Jan. 3rd. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney also saw a surge after the debate, passing Newt Gingrich in daily new Likes for the first time in nearly a month.

    Paul came into the debate rising in the polls, and he expressed strong anti-war views that might have led to increased activity on his Facebook page. Paul gained nearly twice as many new fans as Romney after the debate, though Romney continues to hold the lead as the most popular Republican presidential candidate with more than 1.2 million Likes.

    Newt Gingrich’s Facebook growth ebbed and flowed slightly over the past week, as his national poll numbers dropped. Rick Perry saw a spike in new fans last weekend after the debate in Des Moines, but did not maintain momentum with this latest debate.

    Herman Cain, who suspended his campaign amid allegations of sexual harassment and an extra-marital affair, continues to see a daily decrease in fans.


  34. jacqlynsmith says:

    If you haven’t contributed NOW is the time….let’s help the Dr. take our country back from the ESTABLISHMENT……please do what you can…..even $5 will help….

    Ron Paul: “I Have a Plan to Fight Back”

    “The establishment is getting scared. They’ve seen my rise in the polls, and they are now going to resort to attacks and SMEAR campaigns to try to derail me.”

    “I have a plan to fight back and get the truth about my record directly to millions of more voters. But I can’t do so without your help.”

    From today’s Campaign Email:

    I just took a peek at the ticker on my website, and we’re over the $2 million mark – halfway to our goal!

    That’s great news, but we can and must keep it up.

    If you haven’t yet contributed to this Tea Party Money Bomb, please do so IMMEDIATELY.

    As I’ve mentioned before, today’s Money Bomb is absolutely CRITICAL to my campaign’s efforts during these last couple of weeks.

    And we can’t forget that the national media and my opponents are now shifting strategy from ignoring my campaign to launching attack after attack.
    I knew this was coming.

    Whenever the political establishment can’t win an argument, they resort to outright SMEARS and fear tactics. But I think they’re just scared of us finally taking our country back from their reckless policies.

    The American people have had enough of the endless assaults on our liberties, the out-of-control spending, TRILLION-dollar, utopian nation-building projects, and the establishment’s Big Government, “bureaucrats-know-best” philosophy.

    That’s why I’m prepared to fight back, but I must have your help.

    If you haven’t yet done so, please contribute IMMEDIATELY!

    On this date four years ago, Patriots like you launched the modern day Tea Party movement with a $6 million money bomb for my campaign.

    What we demanded then, as we do now, is simple – a hard and fast return to the Constitution.

    That’s what I’m running for President to accomplish. That’s what America will return to once I’m elected.

    Unlike my opponents, I don’t flip-flop around and break promises.

    I keep them.

    I’m in this to win, and I have every intention of doing so.

    But it’s you who has the power to make that happen.

    If you haven’t yet contributed to my Tea Party Money Bomb, please donate IMMEDIATELY!

    For Liberty,

    Ron Paul

    P.S. The establishment is getting scared. They’ve seen my rise in the polls, and they are now going to resort to attacks and SMEAR campaigns to try to derail me.

    I have a plan to fight back and get the truth about my record directly to millions of more voters. But I can’t do so without your help.


  35. jacqlynsmith says:

    The Real Anti-War President ..THE ONLY ONE! RON PAUL

  36. jacqlynsmith says:

    Plaster this everywhere folks…..

    The Real Anti-War President ..THE ONLY ONE! RON PAUL

  37. jacqlynsmith says:

    A Call to Action: Ron Paul’s message cannot be stopped!

  38. jacqlynsmith says:

    This is a great interview…..please pass it on…..

    Jerry Doyle Interviews Bruce Fein On Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy After The Iowa Debate – 12/16/11

  39. jacqlynsmith says:

    UMMMMM…looks like someone else didn’t want to launch an attack on IRAN….

    George Bush Blocked Israeli Air Strike Against Iranian Nuclear Facilities, Cited Blowback & Blockage of Strait of Hormuz

    Israel asked US for green light to bomb nuclear sites in Iran
    US president told Israeli prime minister he would not back attack on Iran, senior European diplomatic sources tell Guardian

    Thursday 25 September 2008

    “Bush’s decision to refuse to offer any support for a strike on Iran appeared to be based on two factors, the sources said. One was US concern over Iran’s likely retaliation, which would probably include a wave of attacks on US military and other personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as on shipping in the Persian Gulf.”


  40. jacqlynsmith says:

    Ron Paul on Leno…Dec. 16th….

    Pt. 1

    Pt. 2

    Pt. 3

    Pt. 4…..Joe Rogan from Fear Factor endorses Dr. Paul…..

  41. jacqlynsmith says:

    Cool….if Ron Paul doesn’t win the GOP nomination and doesn’t go 3rd party then we have someone else to vote for…..

    GOP Can Thank Itself for Gary Johnson’s Third Party Run

    The Republican Party has bought itself unnecessary trouble through its high-handed treatment of a fine public servant. Former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (no relation) is running for the GOP presidential nomination — but you’d never know it based on the debates. Gov. Johnson has been invited to exactly two of the Republican primary debates, both hosted by Fox News. In the second, he memorably said, “My neighbor’s two dogs have created more shove-ready jobs” than Obama.

    Otherwise, he has been systematically excluded from the debates on the grounds that his poll numbers are too low. then again, his name does not appear on the polls the companies use to determine who can participate, making his exclusion a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    Now, Johnson is seriously considering seeking the Libertarian Party presidential nomination in 2012. He told the Santa Fe New Mexican:

    “I feel abandoned by the Republican Party,” Johnson said in a phone interview. “The Republican Party has left me by the wayside”…

    “If I’d have been included in 16 of the last debates we wouldn’t even be having this conversation,” Johnson said.

    In other words, his potential third party run was totally avoidable and should be laid directly at the feet of the GOP establishment.

    Johnson once told me whenever the networks hold a GOP debate — which is approximately every seven hours — “It appears as though they all get together and invoke the ‘Gary Johnson Rule,’ which is: How do we exclude Gary Johnson from the debate? I’m just getting this sense that they actually sit down ahead of time and come up with the rule after they take a look at me. I can’t help but think that.”

    Johnson at times scored higher than competitors like Jon Huntsman, who has appeared in every single debate.

    When Johnson appealed to the Republican National Convention for help in being included, Republican Party counsel John R. Phillippe Jr. replied by letter: “We simply have to have some minimum criteria in order for candidates to participate in these debates. Otherwise, the debates would be utter chaos and unhelpful to Republican voters as we select our nominee.”

    Some criteria? How about serving two terms as the popular governor of a heavily Democratic swing state? How about defying the free-spending Bush years by vetoing more bills than all other governors combined?

    Including Gary Johnson in the debates would have allowed him to feel he had had his say and exposed the Republican Party to some unique ideas. Johnson has shown real leadership by grabbing the third rail of GOP politics and proposing a military spending reduction of 43 percent — paid for by allowing Europe to defend itself for the first time since the Adolf took his final glance at Eva. After nearly 70 years, it’s time for Germany and France to see if they can develop their own Greatest Generation. Gov. Johnson opposed King Obama’s war-by-decree in Libya from the beginning, as he did with Iraq. (He favored Afghanistan.)

    He also has a cornucopia of issues that would keep him from winning the Republican presidential nomination barring anything short of a miracle. He is pro-choice on abortion, which alone disqualifies him for many Republican voters. He favors drug legalization and used medicinal marijuana himself, although San Francisco’s prescription pot mills show where that road ends. He endorsed same-sex “marriage.”, claiming “denying those rights and benefits to gay couples is discrimination, plain and simple.” (There are plenty of reasons for the state to maintain the status quo on an institution that dates to the dawn of time other than “discrimination,” Governor Johnson.)

    The GOP establishment could have easily allowed him to debate, fail to catch fire, then let him feel he had his chance, and the voters had spoken. If he sought the Libertarian nod, many would dismiss him as a political opportunist. Instead, he feels justifiably excluded and is considering a course that could see him drain meaningful support from Republicans in the general election — all because the party elite did not want a second candidate on the stage who sounded like Ron Paul.

    Discussing how his ideology would shape his hypothetical third party run, he said, “I’m really speaking here with a broad brush, but anti-war, supporting a woman’s right to choose, gay marriage — that’s taking away from the Democratic base.”

    But, he added, “I might be taking votes away from the fiscal Republicans.”

    In a closely contested election like 2012, the GOP cannot afford to lose a single Republican vote. If the Gary Johnson flap costs it a single vote, the GOP brought it on itself.


  42. GBAmerica says:

    Thank You!Boots on the ground for Ron Paul!

  43. jacqlynsmith says:

    Please pass this on…..really good…..

    Ron Paul not “crazy/kooky” says Army Psychiatrist

  44. jacqlynsmith says:

    Huckabee Picks Ron Paul N Iowa, Now, Destroy Their Hope

  45. jacqlynsmith says:


    Ron Paul Exploding!

  46. jacqlynsmith says:

    Vote for Ron Paul on this Bill O’Reilly Poll
    lower right…

  47. jacqlynsmith says:

    Great commentary……

    Hornberger’s Blog
    Monday, December 19, 2011

    REMINDER: The Jacob Hornberger Show every Saturday at 7-7:30 pm EST. Listen and watch live on the Internet: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/the-future-of-freedom-foundation

    Why Ron Paul’s Surge Is Making Them Nervous
    by Jacob G. Hornberger

    While big government statists in both the Republican and Democrat parties remain mystified over Ron Paul’s surge in the polls in Iowa, the ones who seem most confounded by this phenomenon are the members of the mainstream media, who themselves are statist to the core. They just can’t figure out how it’s possible that increasing numbers of people are gravitating to the Paul campaign, especially when the mainstream media has either ignored Paul’s campaign or done its best to ridicule Paul’s libertarian positions.

    One of the most amusing aspects to this phenomenon is when the mainstream media statists do their best to bring Paul’s views to the general public, with the expectation that when people learn what he really stands for, they’ll rush into the waiting embrace of big-government statists like, well, like Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney.

    Yet, what actually ends up happening is that when people hear what Ron Paul stands for, instead of running for the big-government types, many of them say to themselves, “You mean, there is a candidate that stands for that? Well, that’s the way I feel. I’m going over to the Ron Paul campaign.”

    Thus, the mainstream media effort to advertise Paul’s libertarian views boomerangs on the statist press, and it confounds them to no end. So, many of the mainstream media statists return to simply ignoring the Paul campaign and acting as though Gingrich and Romney are the only two frontrunners.

    A good example of this phenomenon involves Iran. During the GOP presidential debates, the mainstream media statists say something that could be interpreted like this:

    Mr. Paul, you don’t want to bomb Iran, like the other candidates do. This is shocking . How can you expect people to take you seriously if you’re not willing to bomb Iran? Don’t you know that they’re producing a nuclear weapon? Our government officials say so. What do you think our military is for?

    Paul responds with something along these lines:

    No, I do not believe that we should bomb Iran. That would involve killing and maiming several hundred thousand more innocent people, which would be added to the hundreds of thousands of innocent killed and maimed in Iraq.

    No, I don’t believe that they’re producing a nuclear bomb because the actual evidence doesn’t support that assertion, and government officials often lie about such things in order to garner support for regime-change operations. Look at Iraq, a war which the mainstream media supported because it never doubted that government officials were telling the truth about those bogus WMDs.

    But even if Iraq was producing a nuclear weapon, it wouldn’t affect anything anyway because they’re not going to go out and start a nuclear war that would result in the obliteration of their country.

    And let’s not forget that the Iranians might just be concerned with another U.S. regime-change operation, like when the CIA ousted their democratically elected prime minister in 1953 and installed a brutal unelected dictator in his stead. After all, it’s not Iran that has the United States surrounded by military forces. It’s the other way around.

    We’ve killed enough people around the world. It’s time to end the wars and bring our troops home.

    At this point, those in mainstream media are ecstatic. In their minds, Paul’s libertarian position on Iran is just whacko and so loony that they’re certain that the American people are going to say, “Oh my gosh, I can’t believe that Ron Paul doesn’t want to go bomb Iran. That’s horrible. If we don’t bomb Iran, then who should we bomb?”

    But there are obviously many Americans — in growing numbers — who are achieving a breakthrough on foreign policy — the same breakthrough that libertarians achieved a long time ago. They’re seeing the fundamental wrongfulness, in terms of both morality and religion, of attacking and bombing countries that haven’t attacked the United States.

    They’re seeing how this type of thing produces anger and hatred for the United States, which then manifests itself in retaliatory terrorist attacks, attacks that are then used to take away our civil liberties here at home — and that are also then used to go and bomb more countries, thereby ensuring this cycle of death, destruction, and loss of liberty continues into perpetuity.

    They’re also seeing what Paul and libertarians have long emphasized — that all this imperialistic military aggression is expensive, to the point that it is hurtling us down the road to bankruptcy.

    Moreover, the phenomenon starts to feed on itself. As more people gravitate to libertarian positions, it causes others to say, “Maybe I should check into libertarianism and see why people are so excited and passionate about it.”

    Whenever asked about the Ron Paul surge, statists always respond, “Well, he can’t win.” Since they’ve convinced themselves that he can’t win, why are they so nervous? Because they see more and more people moving toward libertarianism and getting excited and passionate about it. And they just can’t figure out what to do about it. Ignoring the phenomenon hasn’t worked and neither has ridiculing.

    Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of the Future of Freedom Foundation.


  48. jacqlynsmith says:

    Department of Defense Report – more evidence Ron Paul is right about Iran
    Submitted by PTDM on Mon, 12/19/2011 – 11:20
    Check out the well-written story here:


    And the Department of Defense report from 2010 here:

    Key quotes:

    “Iran’s nuclear program and its willingness to keep open the
    possibility of developing nuclear weapons is a central part of its
    deterrent strategy.”

    “At present Iran’s forces are sufficent to deter or defend against
    conventional threats from Iran’s weaker neighbors such as post-war Iraq,
    the GCC, Azerbaijan or Afghanistan but lack the air power and
    logistical ability to power much beyond Iran’s boarders or to confront
    regional powers such as Turkey or Israel.”

    Let the lies be shamed and solid evidence be revealed!


  49. jacqlynsmith says:

    This was back in 2003 but you the fact that Wolfowitz made these statements way back then proves DR. Paul is clearly RIGHT on his foreign policy beliefs…….time to WAKE UP AMERICA AND FACE THE TRUTH……

    Paul Wolfowitz Agrees with Ron Paul – Spread this to neocons
    Submitted by Brian Middleton on Mon, 12/19/2011 – 05:56

    This is the ACTUAL quotes from Wolfowitz on BLOWBACK and 9/11/

    “[W]e can now remove almost all of our forces from Saudi Arabia. Their presence there over the last 12 years has been a source of enormous difficulty for a friendly government. It’s been a huge recruiting device for al Qaeda. In fact if you look at bin Laden, one of his principle grievances was the presence of so-called crusader forces on the holy land, Mecca and Medina. I think just lifting that burden from the Saudis is itself going to open the door to other positive things.”

    Wolfowitz, 2003

    Full interview from the US Department of Defense website:


  50. Ann says:

    floridafree says:
    December 13, 2011 at 10:30 pm
    I love it watching all of the talking heads at FAUX tripping over their tongue’s as they are starting to admit that Ron Paul could win Iowa with polls showing him only 1% behind neoCON should have been long gone Gingrich.
    I no longer watch Faux News but I agree that it would be funny to watch. He’s ahead of NeoCON Gingrich now! lol Guess their heads are exploding!!! 😉

  51. jacqlynsmith says:

    George Washington’s Vision
    George Washington’s Vision
    Recorded at the Library of Congress

    Valley Forge, the winter of 1777, American forces were fighting
    against the British, the most powerful nation in the world. Many
    believe that only 3% of the American people took part in the struggle
    for independence, while “Tories” gave aid and comfort to the British
    “This afternoon, as I was sitting at this table engaged in preparing a
    dispatch, something seemed to disturb me. Looking up, I beheld
    standing opposite me a singularly beautiful female. So astonished was
    I, for I had given strict orders not to be disturbed, that it was some
    moments before I found language to inquire the cause of her presence.
    A second, a third and even a fourth time did I repeat my question, but
    received no answer from my mysterious visitor except a slight raising
    of her eyes.
    “By this time I felt strange sensations spreading through me. I would
    have risen but the riveted gaze of the being before me rendered
    volition impossible. I assayed once more to address her, but my tongue
    had become useless, as though it had become paralyzed.
    “A new influence, mysterious, potent, irresistible, took possession of
    me. All I could do was to gaze steadily, vacantly at my unknown
    visitor, Gradually the surrounding atmosphere seemed as if it had
    become filled with sensations, and luminous. Everything about me
    seemed to rarify, the mysterious visitor herself becoming more airy
    and yet more distinct to my sight than before. I now began to feel as
    one dying, or rather to experience the sensations which I have
    sometimes imagined accompany dissolution. I did not think, I did not
    reason, I did not move; all were alike impossible. I was only
    conscious of gazing fixedly, vacantly at my companion.
    “Presently I heard a voice saying, `Son of the Republic, look and
    learn,’ while at the same time my visitor extended her arm eastwardly.
    I now beheld a heavy white vapor at some distance rising fold upon
    fold. This gradually dissipated, and I looked upon a strange scene.
    Before me lay spread out in one vast plain all the countries of the
    world; Europe, Asia, Africa and America. I saw rolling and tossing
    between Europe and America the billows of the Atlantic, and between
    Asia and America lay the Pacific.
    ” `Son of the Republic’ said the same mysterious voice as before,
    `look and learn,’ At that moment I beheld a dark, shadowy being, like
    an angel, standing, or rather floating in mid-air, between Europe and
    America. Dipping water out of the ocean in the hollow of each hand, he
    sprinkled some upon America with his right hand, while with his left
    hand he cast some on Europe. Immediately a cloud raised from these
    countries, and joined in mid-ocean. For a while it remained
    stationary, and then moved slowly westward, until it enveloped America
    in its murky folds. Sharp flashes of lightning gleamed through it at
    intervals, and I heard the smothered groans and cries of the American
    “A second time the angel dipped water from the ocean, and sprinkled it
    out as before. The dark cloud was then drawn back to the ocean, in
    whose heaving billows it sank from view. A third time I heard the
    mysterious voice saying, `Son of the Republic, look and learn,’ I cast
    my eyes upon America and beheld villages and towns and cities
    springing up one after another until the whole land from the Atlantic
    to the Pacific was dotted with them.
    “Again, I heard the mysterious voice say, `Son of the Republic, the
    end of the century cometh, look and learn.’ At this the dark shadowy
    angel turned his face southward, and from Africa I saw an ill-omened
    spectre approach our land. It flitted slowly over every town and city
    of the latter. The inhabitants presently set themselves in battle
    array against each other. As I continued looking I a saw bright angel,
    on whose brow rested a crown of light, on which was traced the word
    `Union,’ bearing the American flag which he placed between the divided
    nation, and said, `Remember ye are brethren.’ Instantly, the
    inhabitants, casting from them their weapons became friends once more,
    and united around the National Standard.
    “And again I heard the mysterious voice saying, `Son of the Republic,
    look and learn.’ At this the dark, shadowy angel placed a trumpet to
    his mouth, and blew three distinct blasts; and taking water from the
    ocean, he sprinkled it upon Europe, Asia and Africa. Then my eyes
    beheld a fearful scene: from each of these countries arose thick,
    black clouds that were soon joined into one. Throughout this mass
    there gleamed a dark red light by which I saw hordes of armed men,
    who, moving with the cloud, marched by land and sailed by sea to
    America. Our country was enveloped in this volume of cloud, and I saw
    these vast armies devastate the whole country and burn the villages,
    towns and cities that I beheld springing up. As my ears listened to
    the thundering of the cannon, clashing of swords, and the shouts and
    cries of millions in mortal combat, I heard again the mysterious voice
    saying, `Son of the Republic, look and learn.’ When the voice had
    ceased, the dark shadowy angel placed his trumpet once more to his
    mouth, and blew a long and fearful blast.
    “Instantly a light as of a thousand suns shone down from above me, and
    pierced and broke into fragments the dark cloud which enveloped
    America. At the same moment the angel upon whose head still shone the
    word Union, and who bore our national flag in one hand and a sword in
    the other, descended from the heavens attended by legions of white
    spirits. These immediately joined the inhabitants of America, who I
    perceived were well nigh overcome, but who immediately taking courage
    again, closed up their broken ranks and renewed the battle.
    “Again, amid the fearful noise of the conflict, I heard the mysterious
    voice saying, `Son of the Republic, look and learn.’ As the voice
    ceased, the shadowy angel for the last time dipped water from the
    ocean and sprinkled it upon America. Instantly the dark cloud rolled
    back, together with the armies it had brought, leaving the inhabitants
    of the land victorious!
    “Then once more I beheld the villages, towns and cities springing up
    where I had seen them before, while the bright angel, planting the
    azure standard he had brought in the midst of them, cried with o loud
    voice” `While the stars remain, and the heavens send down dew upon the
    earth, so long shall the Union last.’ And taking from his brow the
    crown on which blazoned the word `UNION,’ he placed it upon the
    Standard while the people, kneeling down, said, `Amen.’
    “The scene instantly began to fade and dissolve, and I at last saw
    nothing but the rising, curling vapor I at first beheld. This also
    disappearing, I found myself once more gazing upon the mysterious
    visitor, who, in the same voice I had heard before, said, `Son of the
    Republic, what you have seen is thus interpreted: three great perils
    will come upon the Republic. The most fearful is the third, but in
    this greatest conflict the whole world united shall not prevail
    against her. Let every child of the Republic learn to live for his
    God, his land and the Union. With these words the vision vanished, and
    I started from my seat and felt that I had seen a vision wherein had
    been shown to me the birth, progress and destiny of the United

  52. GBAmerica says:


  53. jacqlynsmith says:

    People are waking up finally and voting their minds…..the ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA and GOP are having fits because their MIND CONTROL is NO longer working on millions of Americans…..JOIN THE REVOLUTION…..VOTE RON PAUL 2012!!!
    Ron Paul Hate From Establishment Republicans

  54. margieu says:

    Hi wanted to wish every one a very Merry Christmas. We have much work to do to restore OUR Republic. Does anyone know what happened to Linda from NY? I always enjoyed her posts full of info. I dod not see her posting anymore. Stay safe all, God Bless America.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s